Brit Ear Leader Bends Over
I’m glad I’m not a Brit. Really glad. I see the slow demise of that once-great country, running headlong into a maelstrom (I love that word) straight to a hell on Earth. First it was the Archbishop of Canterbury arguing for Shari’a law in Great Britain, and dealing with the lovefest Ken Livingstone has for Islam. And now, you have the heir to the throne of England, the Prince of Wales, come out and say this:
Prince Charles yesterday urged the world to follow Islamic ‘spiritual principles’ in order to protect the environment.
In an hour-long speech, the heir to the throne argued that man’s destruction of the world was contrary to the scriptures of all religions -- but particularly those of Islam.
He said the current ‘division’ between man and nature had been caused not just by industrialisation, but also by our attitude to the environment -- which goes against the grain of ‘sacred traditions’.
Says the man with his own private jet, his own private motorcade, and countless estates. Keep in mind, he was speaking at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, so there may have been some sucking-up involved. Yes, that’s my way of saying the idiot has no spine. Not to worry, though…. he digs deeper in the hole:
He added: ‘The inconvenient truth is that we share this planet with the rest of creation for a very good reason -- and that is, we cannot exist on our own without the intricately balanced web of life around us.
‘Islam has always taught this and to ignore that lesson is to default on our contract with creation.’
REALLY?????? The same religion that laid waste to the delicate ecosystem of the marshes in Iraq as retribution for an uprising against Saddam Hussein? The same religion that destroyed the priceless Bhuddist statues in Afghanistan? The same religion that sanctions the murder of women who are rape victims? The same religion that sanctions the hanging of a seven-year-old boy and rejoices in the suicide bombing at an Afghan wedding? I could go on for hours detailing what Islam has taught me, but my blood pressure can’t take it.
What I find truly galling is that this so-called prince is heir to the throne of England, which makes him the future head of the Church of England. I always wondered why Queen Elizabeth II refused to abdicate upon reaching retirement age. Now I know: she doesn’t trust her own first born at all. I think she first got the inkling when he decided to separate from Princess Diana. Newsflash, Chuckles: it doesn’t look good on the Church stationery having an adulterer as its leader. You say you have “studied the Koran” extensively? I suggest you go back and study the Holy Bible extensively, if you have any hope of becoming king, which I hope never comes to pass. The Queen is a sharp lady, and it has not escaped my notice how she is grooming Prince William for his ascension to the throne.
Fuckall I need a drink.
A big ThankYe to the Curtal Friar for posting his own take. Go over and take a gander at his site if only for the Daily Babes 
Loading ...
Yeah, seems to me that many times in English history, there were heirs to the throne that either disappeared, got sent to battle and were subsequently killed, were grabbed outright and beheaded in the public square, and any other number of ways to get rid of the shit before he could take power and ruin the land.
If I were Charlie, and the Queen as smart as she seems to be, I would start worrying.
I think she is letting him do all the damage all on his own. There is no law in their monarchy that states the first born automatically gets the Crown. If I recall, the Queen has final say on who the true heir is. She is letting him dig deeper, so when the time comes she can say, “Oh, sweetie, you are such a fuck-up, I have to go with Wills here.”
I wish I could be there for that
I doubt Chuckles even cares at this point. Feh.
Aggie, TOTAL agreement. 12 years stationed in England, and I never thought Charles worthy.
CHarles isn’t Elizabeth II’s firstborn (he’s her husband) and is not in the line of succession, but apart from that you’re spot on.
You know, it used to be said “There’s always be an England,” but now it seems that statement is morphing into, “There’ll always be a subject island off the coast of the Caliphate of France.”
I wanna know how come every time a few rape victims get murdered for (obvious) adultery, or a devout Muslim fulfills their jihadic duty to Allah (praise his name) with a suicide bombing, everyone seems to get their knickers all in a twist a starts getting pissy against the religion of peace? Thank god for the rational and laid back liberals!!
Asalamu Alekum
Actually, her husband is Prince Phillip, David. Charles is indeed her son, and successor to the Crown, more’s the pity.